Wrap long lines in editor

[ache]

It would be convenient if editor gets the ability to wrap lines when line length exceeds screen width.

[slavazanko]

Is you mean behaviour like VI(M)?

[ache]

Yes, similar to VIM with wrap=on.

[andrew_b]

Ticket #4336 has been marked as a duplicate of this ticket.

[andrew_b]

Ticket #4492 has been marked as a duplicate of this ticket.

[psprint]

Add soft wraps to MCEdit

[psprint]

Hi,
I've implemented screen-only division of long lines. I'll call it soft wraps.

I think that this feature is missing from mcedit. Currently, when a line exceeds the screen it is scrolled right. This is, IMHO, a less effective way of working with long lines. More natural is to have them soft-divided by the editor with moving, home/end keys support, etc.

The patch is little long and complex, but I'm using it from 2 years with no problems. To have the lines soft wrapped, select "Soft wraps" in the General options dialog.

---

Answering the comment in the previous (closed as duplicate) ticket: there are markings of the wrapped lines – if one enables line numbers: ​https://asciinema.org/a/KVP6dRocGtb2XGLO26sjL60sZ. Also I disagree that code shouldn't be folded at least to me, as I'm using the patch from 2 years to edit code. After turning the option on I've never looked back.

[psprint]

An update that restores the missing CK action allowing keybind toggling soft wraps (alt-w by default)

[psprint]

I've restored the keybinding SoftFolds? that got lost in the merge (Alt-w by default). Demo: ​https://asciinema.org/a/o3N8nrNdt3Q1dBjHGt0yP6uP8

[andrew_b]

https://midnight-commander.org/wiki/Hacking

[psprint]

Reformatted the patch to meet Hacking document. Other things like comparing NULL for pointers instead of if(ptr) already meet

[psprint]

Andrew: I've submitted updated patch

[andrew_b]

https://midnight-commander.org/wiki/Hacking

[psprint]

Replying to andrew_b:

https://midnight-commander.org/wiki/Hacking

I've uploaded updated patch. I've removed int q=Q() from it. Are there any other things that are unaligned? I would ask for a direct references or at least names of the formatting/code errors.

[psprint]

An update that removes the inline declaration assignments like: int q=Q()

[andrew_b]

Replying to psprint:

I've uploaded updated patch. I've removed int q=Q() from it. Are there any other things that are unaligned?

Is it all that you read in HACKING?

I would ask for a direct references or at least names of the formatting/code errors.

• Follow source templates
• Do not unnecessarily use braces where a single statement will do.
• Use your best judgement and choose the more readable option.

          for (;
               (edit_buffer_get_byte_ex (buf, current_eol) != '\n') &&
               current_eol <= buf->size &&
               (current_eol == current_save
                ||
                ((q =
                  edit_move_forward3 (buf->edit_widget, current_bol, 0, current_eol, FALSE,
                                      0) % buf->end_col) != 0));
               current_eol =
               edit_move_forward3 (buf->edit_widget, current_eol, 1, 0, FALSE, 0), current_eol +=
               prev_eol == current_eol ? 1 : 0, prev_eol = current_eol)
              ;
  

Save my eyes and my brain.

• Avoid initialized and not initialized variables in one declaration.
• Reduce variable scope as much as possible: declare local variable in that block where it is used.
• Split variable declaration and code using one empty line.
• Do not use gboolean as integer and integer as gboolean.

And this is only the first step.

[psprint]

Sorry, but I have to stop supporting this patch. Someone paid me for the soft wraps implementation, but now the financing stopped and I'm unable to meet your high level expectations.