Ticket #84 (accepted defect) — at Version 10
savannah: File names not correctly handled in iso9660 vfs
Reported by: | slavazanko | Owned by: | guanx |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | major | Milestone: | 4.7.0-pre1 |
Component: | mc-vfs | Version: | 4.6.2-pre1 |
Keywords: | Cc: | ||
Blocked By: | Blocking: | ||
Branch state: | merged | Votes for changeset: |
Description (last modified by metux) (diff)
Original: http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?23753
Submitted by: | Guan Xin <cppgx> | Submitted on: | Fri 04 Jul 2008 03:27:46 AM UTC |
Category: | VFS | Severity: | 3 - Normal |
Status: | None | Privacy: | Public |
Assigned to: | None | Open/Closed: | Open |
Release: | 4.6.1 | Operating System: | All |
Discussion:
Fri 04 Jul 2008 03:27:46 AM UTC, original submission: Because filenames are not properly processed, mc does not work with isoinfo. GNU Midnight Commander 2007-03-09-18 isoinfo 2.01.01a18 1. Got wrong file names. Then no file could be copied out. 2. Does not handle symlinks in .iso files. Please apply the attached patch.
branch:84_iso9660
changeset:d6a6f40ad2d359ec05363656cf05bc5f84ce1c52
Change History
Changed 16 years ago by slavazanko
- Attachment iso9660.in.diff added
comment:3 Changed 16 years ago by guanx
- Keywords iso9660 isoinfo awk regular expression added
- Version set to 4.6.2~pre1
- Milestone set to 4.6.2
comment:6 Changed 16 years ago by winnie
- Blocking 217 removed
(In #217) This bug surely belongs into the bugfix 4.6.X but as the buglist for 4.6.2 is already freezed this will be fixed in 4.6.3.
I'll add a review keyword to this patch so we can review it, if this patch is approved before the 4.6.2 release this will be part of the release, but it won't be a blocker.
comment:7 follow-up: ↓ 8 Changed 16 years ago by winnie
- Keywords review added; iso9660 isoinfo awk regular expression removed
- Milestone changed from 4.6.2 to 4.6.3
This bug surely belongs into the bugfix 4.6.X but as the buglist for 4.6.2 is already freezed this will be fixed in 4.6.3.
I'll add a review keyword to this patch so we can review it, if this patch is approved before the 4.6.2 release this will be part of the release, but it won't be a blocker.
comment:8 in reply to: ↑ 7 ; follow-up: ↓ 9 Changed 16 years ago by guanx
Replying to winnie:
This bug surely belongs into the bugfix 4.6.X but as the buglist for 4.6.2 is already freezed this will be fixed in 4.6.3.
I'll add a review keyword to this patch so we can review it, if this patch is approved before the 4.6.2 release this will be part of the release, but it won't be a blocker.
Sorry, I'm not familiar with this system. I've created a useless ticket (#217) which is duplicate. I'll be more careful in the future.
comment:9 in reply to: ↑ 8 Changed 16 years ago by winnie
Replying to guanx:
Replying to winnie:
This bug surely belongs into the bugfix 4.6.X but as the buglist for 4.6.2 is already freezed this will be fixed in 4.6.3.
I'll add a review keyword to this patch so we can review it, if this patch is approved before the 4.6.2 release this will be part of the release, but it won't be a blocker.
Sorry, I'm not familiar with this system. I've created a useless ticket (#217) which is duplicate. I'll be more careful in the future.
No problem, you don't have to be sorry for that. It's nice to see new people commiting patches. If you like feel free to review also patches and add your thoughts about them to the appropiate ticket.
added by cppgx