11 | | Mon 07 May 2007 04:18:32 PM UTC, comment #5: |
12 | | |
13 | | huh? you actually used ssh for that? i guess that's a fine optimization. |
14 | | but for the general case the chunking should be homegrown (based on |
15 | | dd and printf/read, i guess). |
16 | | Oswald Buddenhagen <ossi> |
17 | | Mon 07 May 2007 01:06:26 PM UTC, comment #4: |
18 | | |
19 | | I've tested the ssh ability to tunnel multiple session over the same |
20 | | connection and it works nicely. There is one problem though - it is |
21 | | supported only with SSH protocol v2. |
22 | | Pavel Tsekov <ptsekov> |
23 | | Project Administrator |
24 | | Wed 02 May 2007 01:20:28 PM UTC, comment #3: |
25 | | |
26 | | Unfortunately kde's fish implementation (as found in kioslave/fish |
27 | | directory) is not a improvement in this particular case. At least I |
28 | | do not see any code which deals with aborting a file transfer |
29 | | gracefully. Most likely the connection is just killed. |
30 | | Pavel Tsekov <ptsekov> |
31 | | Project Administrator |
32 | | Fri 27 Apr 2007 01:38:47 PM UTC, comment #2: |
33 | | |
34 | | Sounds interesting - I'll take a look at it. My perl is pretty bad |
35 | | though - I hope the code is not too complicated. |
36 | | Pavel Tsekov <ptsekov> |
37 | | Project Administrator |
38 | | Fri 27 Apr 2007 12:20:17 PM UTC, comment #1: |
39 | | |
40 | | no, i think we can do like ssh does, i.e., tunnel multiple virtual |
41 | | connections through one physical connection. this adds some |
42 | | overhead, though (especially cpu-wise, as we have to call dd for |
43 | | every chunk). |
44 | | |
45 | | btw, you might want to look at kde's fishserv.pl, it has some |
46 | | optimizations. never looked at it myself, though. |
47 | | Oswald Buddenhagen <ossi> |
48 | | Fri 27 Apr 2007 08:40:45 AM UTC, original submission: |
49 | | |
| 23 | |
| 24 | Comment 1 by Oswald Buddenhagen <ossi> at Fri 27 Apr 2007 12:20:17 PM UTC: |
| 25 | {{{ |
| 26 | no, i think we can do like ssh does, i.e., tunnel multiple virtual |
| 27 | connections through one physical connection. this adds some |
| 28 | overhead, though (especially cpu-wise, as we have to call dd for |
| 29 | every chunk). |
| 30 | |
| 31 | btw, you might want to look at kde's fishserv.pl, it has some |
| 32 | optimizations. never looked at it myself, though. |
| 33 | }}} |
| 34 | |
| 35 | Comment 2 by Pavel Tsekov <ptsekov> at Fri 27 Apr 2007 01:38:47 PM UTC: |
| 36 | {{{ |
| 37 | Sounds interesting - I'll take a look at it. My perl is pretty bad |
| 38 | though - I hope the code is not too complicated. |
| 39 | }}} |
| 40 | |
| 41 | Comment 3 by Pavel Tsekov <ptsekov> at Wed 02 May 2007 01:20:28 PM UTC: |
| 42 | {{{ |
| 43 | Unfortunately kde's fish implementation (as found in kioslave/fish |
| 44 | directory) is not a improvement in this particular case. At least I |
| 45 | do not see any code which deals with aborting a file transfer |
| 46 | gracefully. Most likely the connection is just killed. |
| 47 | }}} |
| 48 | |
| 49 | Comment 4 by Pavel Tsekov <ptsekov> at Mon 07 May 2007 01:06:26 PM UTC: |
| 50 | {{{ |
| 51 | I've tested the ssh ability to tunnel multiple session over the same |
| 52 | connection and it works nicely. There is one problem though - it is |
| 53 | supported only with SSH protocol v2. |
| 54 | }}} |
| 55 | |
| 56 | Comment 5 by Oswald Buddenhagen <ossi> at Mon 07 May 2007 04:18:32 PM UTC: |
| 57 | {{{ |
| 58 | huh? you actually used ssh for that? i guess that's a fine optimization. |
| 59 | but for the general case the chunking should be homegrown (based on |
| 60 | dd and printf/read, i guess). |
| 61 | }}} |