Changes between Initial Version and Version 1 of Ticket #3684, comment 17


Ignore:
Timestamp:
09/20/16 19:50:15 (5 years ago)
Author:
mooffie
Comment:

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • Ticket #3684, comment 17

    initial v1  
    2020> To sum up, looks like MC_HOME is indeed more of a home than a profile root, and if you want to change that, please take a closer look at src/vfs/ftpfs/ftpfs.c and those src/filemanager/*.c 
    2121  
    22 Don't throw straw men at us. ftpfs.c happen to prove that my patch is correct. ftpfs.c should read from ~/.netrc. If you want .netrc to be read from some other place **in addition** to its [http://lmgtfy.com/?q=netrc standard place], open a separate ticket. That's off-topic here. As for filemanager/*.c: all these places expect home, not the profile root. 
     22Don't throw straw men at us. ftpfs.c proves the correctness of my patch. ftpfs.c should read from ~/.netrc. If you want .netrc to be read from some other place **in addition** to its [http://lmgtfy.com/?q=netrc standard place], open a separate ticket. That's off-topic here. As for filemanager/*.c: all these places expect home, not the profile root. 
    2323 
    2424Those 24 grepped lines only strengthen the cause of my patch. 
     
    3030Here's another piece of news for you: 
    3131 
    32 If you'd have only bothered to raise this concern of yours like a normal human being (meaning: without attacking/invalidating others), I'd have gladly shared my thoughts on this topic with you. Because, you see, while doing **my** homework I did not fail to not notice the use of that relative pathname. But, knowing you, you'd only use whatever I'm going to write on the matter to "reinforce" you POV and further sabotage this ticket. 
     32If you'd have only bothered to raise this concern of yours like a normal human being (meaning: without attacking/invalidating others), I'd have gladly shared my thoughts on this topic with you. Because, you see, while doing **my** homework I did ''not'' fail to notice the use of that relative pathname. But, knowing you, you'd only use whatever I'm going to write on the matter to "reinforce" you POV and further sabotage this ticket.