Ticket #1927 (closed defect: duplicate)
missing-g_free-in-vfs-extfs.c
| Reported by: | vit_r | Owned by: | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | trivial | Milestone: | |
| Component: | mc-vfs | Version: | |
| Keywords: | Cc: | ||
| Blocked By: | Blocking: | ||
| Branch state: | Votes for changeset: |
Description (last modified by andrew_b) (diff)
in vfs-extfs.c funcs
extfs_readlink(), extfs_unlink(), extfs_mkdir() and extfs_rmdir()
have 'char *q;' which shouid be freed after use
Attachments
Change History
Changed 14 years ago by vit_r
- Attachment 1927-missing-g_free-in-vfs-extfs.c.patch added
comment:1 follow-up: ↓ 2 Changed 14 years ago by andrew_b
- Status changed from new to closed
- Version 4.7.0.1 deleted
- Resolution set to duplicate
- Description modified (diff)
- Milestone 4.7 deleted
Why do you propose this wrong patch again?
Closed as duplicate of 1896.
comment:2 in reply to: ↑ 1 ; follow-up: ↓ 3 Changed 14 years ago by vit_r
Replying to andrew_b:
Why do you propose this wrong patch again?
Closed as duplicate of 1896.
It looked for me that 1896 was closed because of bad description.
But what about four missing g_free(q) in vfs/extfs.c ?
Are they needed or not ?
Can You be so kind to make it clear ?
Please
comment:3 in reply to: ↑ 2 Changed 14 years ago by vit_r
Replying to vit_r:
Replying to andrew_b:
Why do you propose this wrong patch again?
Closed as duplicate of 1896.
It looked for me that 1896 was closed because of bad description.
But what about four missing g_free(q) in vfs/extfs.c ?
Are they needed or not ?
Can You be so kind to make it clear ?
Please
Ohhh..!!!
i've got the point where i was wrong.
No g_free() is missing here
Sorry for disturbance
four missing g_free(q) in vfs/extfs.c